Prince Charles, Free Speech, And Being Real

Prince Charles, Free Speech, And Being Real

 

On my Google Homepage a day or so ago I read an article from USA Today that spoke of some letters that Prince Charles had written to various members of Government throughout the years. I am not from England and I have never been able to afford to travel there so I am not an expert on their Governments inner workings. For those of us who are not from the UK this is a case where evidently the Prince as a member of the Royal Family is not allowed to express his opinions on pretty much on any subject matter because in being who he is he must remain neutral on all subjects. People, how would this even be possible for a person, any person, to never express their opinion, especially if you are in constant media glare like a person such as Prince Charles is?

 

Evidently a Media source in the UK had filed suit under the freedom of closure type of act years ago to have these 27 letters released to the public. Prince Charles had fought their release because they were private letters. Personally I disagree with the final Court decision to release the letters because I agree with Prince Charles, they were private. My point is this, why should every citizen in the UK have freedom of their own speech but Prince Charles because he is a member of the Royal Family should have none? Also, how does a person go through life with no opinion at all on anything? Briton, is that what you really want? Do you want the members of the Royal Family to be totally muted? Do you really not have and interest in these people as to who they really are as people nor what they really think as individuals on different subject matter? Their family is not able to enforce their will on any of you so why should they not be allowed to express their opinions in the same legal manner that every other citizen of the UK are allowed to do?

 

If these people can not feel free to express their opinions in private with others then are you not then guilty of insisting they follow an impossible course that you yourself can not abide to? Do you really want all of the Royal Family to be nothing but a photo shoot with a bunch of empty suits? If you want that, go visit the inner DC Beltway there is enough of that phony there to drown a Duck.

 

 

England: New $3 Billion Dollar Aircraft Carrier Has A Huge Leak

(THIS ARTICLE IS COURTESY OF THE BRITISH NEWS PAPER ‘THE SUN’)

 

The vast warship is letting in 200 litres of water every hour due to a faulty seal around one of its propeller shafts

THE Royal Navy’s new £3.1billion aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth has a leak so serious it may need to go back into dry dock — for repairs that will cost millions.

A faulty seal around one of the vast warship’s propeller shafts means 200 litres of sea water pour in every hour.

 The Royal Navy's new £3.1billion aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth has a 'significant' leak that may cost millions

PA:PRESS ASSOCIATION
5
The Royal Navy’s new £3.1billion aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth has a ‘significant’ leak that may cost millions

Insiders said there is a “significant” defect with the stern seal, an inflatable rubber ring that fits around one of the propeller shafts.

The problem was spotted during sea trials.

Top Brass are furious because the carrier, the UK’s largest ever warship, had the fault when it was delivered by ship building partnership the ­Aircraft Carrier Alliance.

That means the manufacturers will have to pay for the repairs, not the Ministry of Defence.

 A faulty seal around one of the vast warship’s propeller shafts means 200 litres of sea water pour in every hour

5
A faulty seal around one of the vast warship’s propeller shafts means 200 litres of sea water pour in every hour

But the Navy is now concerned about future repairs which would have to be funded by the taxpayer.

An insider added: “We’re about to uncover the true cost of carrier ­operations.

“There is a feeling that the ACA mugged us off by not sorting this before the handover.”

The Queen Elizabeth is currently in Portsmouth and may need to go back into dry dock to be fixed.

 The Queen unveiled the HMS Queen Elizabeth just over a week ago

GETTY IMAGES – GETTY
5
The Queen unveiled the HMS Queen Elizabeth just over a week ago

The insider said: “She has a leaky stern seal and may need to be docked down to fix it up in Rosyth.

“The seal sits at the point where the shaft leaves the ship.

“It’s pretty important for keeping the water out. It’s leaking at approximately 200 litres an hour which is pretty significant.”

 The repairs to the vast warship are expected to cost millions - but the bill will be footed by manufacturers

5
The repairs to the vast warship are expected to cost millions – but the bill will be footed by manufacturers

An investigation is under way to discover if sister ship HMS Prince of Wales, which is yet to start sea trials, has the same problem.

Despite the fault, the carrier will still go on further sea trials early next year.

At present internal pumps are clearing the sea water and sources say the leak will be fixed by the time it sets sail again.

Sources also say the defective part is not a design fault — like the issue which plagued the fleet of £1billion Type 45 Destroyers.

They have a fault which causes them to break down in hot weather.

The 65,000-ton, 932ft carrier, which has a crew of 700, was formally welcomed into the fleet by the Queen two weeks ago.

Play Video

Queen at ceremony in Portsmouth to commission Royal Navy aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth

Her Majesty was guest of honour at the ship’s commissioning in Portsmouth.

The Queen said of the carrier: “She will in the years and decades ahead represent the country’s resolve on the global stage.”

The Royal Navy confirmed yesterday: “An issue with a shaft seal has been identified during HMS Queen Elizabeth’s sea trials.

“This is scheduled for repair while she is alongside at Portsmouth.

“It does not prevent her from sailing again and her sea trials programme will not be affected.”

 The 65,000-ton ship is expected to be the Royal Navy's flagship for at least 50 years

PA:PRESS ASSOCIATION
5
The 65,000-ton ship is expected to be the Royal Navy’s flagship for at least 50 years

A spokesman for ACA said: “HMS Queen Elizabeth has been accepted into Her Majesty’s fleet.

“It is normal practice for a volume of work and defect resolution to continue following vessel acceptance.

“This will be completed prior to the nation’s flagship re-commencing her programme at sea in 2018.”

Play Video

HMS Queen Elizabeth, the UK’s most powerful ever flagship departs on maiden voyage

Why Is The British Government Not Doing All It Can To Stop Homegrown Terrorism

 

Again today I see on my Google News Homepage an article from CNN about Scotland Yard’s concerns about hundreds of Brits who are returning from Syria who have been training with ISIS. Now I know that I am not the brightest bulb in the package but I have a question about this situation? Why is it that Briton or any other country for that matter feel obligated not to cancel these peoples Passports as soon as their feet hit the ground in Syria? Why is it that Briton, your country, or my country, is somehow required to let these traders and mass murders back into their old neighborhoods? Why can’t our government, British government, or yours, be allowed to protect it’s own citizens by arresting these people the second their repatriated brimstone feet touch OUR soil? You can stop most of the homegrown security risks if you deport and cancel. Is the British Government without the legal right to cancel the Passports of these returning traitors or even the right/obligation to protect it’s own citizens by doing so? Why is it that these people are allowed back into our neighborhoods? Why is it that the Government doesn’t arrest them as soon as they step foot on our soil? Maybe you know the answers to these thoughts, I’m just old and confused I guess.